Area Database (v4.4.1)

GDL Area Profile Report

Download as PDF

Lorestan (Iran, Islamic Rep.)

This GDL Area Profile Report provides an overview of the major social and economic characteristics of the region or country. The figures are derived from the most recent national household survey available at the Global Data Lab. These and many other indicators can also be downloaded freely from the GDL Area Database. Further information on the indicators is available at the bottom of this report and at the GDL website.

Level of development Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
International Wealth Index (IWI) value1 72.4 - 11 / 30 ( 7 ) 2006
Poverty Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Percentage poor households (IWI value under 70) 38.7 - 20 / 30 ( 5 ) 2006
Percentage poorer households (IWI value under 50) 7.63 - 19 / 30 ( 4 ) 2006
Percentage poorest households (IWI value under 35) 2.38 - 22 / 30 ( 4 ) 2006
Education Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Mean years education population aged 20+ 7.59 0.08 12 / 30 ( 6 ) 2011
Mean years education of women aged 20+ 6.90 0.11 13 / 30 ( 5 ) 2011
Mean years education of men aged 20+ 8.30 0.05 9 / 30 ( 6 ) 2011
Educational attendance Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Educational attendance children aged 6-8 (%) 90.0 -0.20 23 / 30 ( 6 ) 2011
Educational attendance children aged 9-11 (%) 94.7 -0.27 6 / 30 ( 5 ) 2011
Educational attendance children aged 12-14 (%) 88.5 -0.14 9 / 30 ( 5 ) 2011
Educational attendance children aged 15-17 (%) 70.4 0.00 12 / 30 ( 4 ) 2011
Educational attendance children aged 18-20 (%) 36.9 0.83 11 / 30 ( 5 ) 2011
Educational attendance children aged 21-23 (%) 27.4 2.20 16 / 30 ( 7 ) 2011
Position of women Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Mean age difference partners (husband-wife) 4.88 -0.11 27 / 30 ( 6 ) 2011
Percentage of women in 50+ population 50.6 0.26 13 / 30 ( 3 ) 2011
Patrilocality Index (positive values patrilocal) 1.91 -0.12 19 / 30 ( 8 ) 2011
Position of children Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Infant mortality rate 24.3 -2.28 19 / 30 ( 4 ) 2011
Under five mortality rate 29.2 -3.09 20 / 30 ( 4 ) 2011
Asset ownership Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Percentage households with a motorbike 12.1 - 4 / 30 ( 6 ) 2006
Percentage households with a computer 12.8 - 3 / 30 ( 5 ) 2006
Access to public services Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Percentage of households with electricity 98.8 - 10 / 30 ( 8 ) 2006
Percentage households with a phone 73.2 - 8 / 30 ( 3 ) 2006
Percentage households with internet access 5.93 - 2 / 30 ( 3 ) 2006
Population Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Total area population in millions 1.77 -0.04 17 / 30 ( 7 ) 2011
Share of national population living in area 2.37 -0.08 17 / 30 ( 2 ) 2011
Average household size 4.45 -0.13 24 / 30 ( 4 ) 2011
Percentage population in urban areas 60.3 0.61 11 / 30 ( 8 ) 2011
Demographic window phase 4 0 3 / 30 ( 2 ) 2011
Dependency ratio 40.5 -1.02 9 / 30 ( 1 ) 2011
Quality of housing Value Trend National rank LMIC decile Year
Percentage households with three or more sleeping rooms 25.0 - 7 / 30 ( 5 ) 2006

Meaning of the menu items: Value: Indicator value in GDL Area Database. Trend: Average yearly change in indicator value since preceding survey. National rank: Within-country rank on indicator (1 is highest value within country). Continent rank: Within continent rank on indicator (continents are America, Africa, Asia/Pacific and (Eastern) Europe). LMIC decile: Decile position on indicator among 1300+ regions within 125+ low and middle income countries.

The indicators presented in this GDL Profile Report are created by aggregating to the sub-national and national level from representative household surveys. Detailed information on the data and methods used is available here and in Smits (2016).

1 The International Wealth Index (IWI) is an asset-based index that measures the economic situation of households in LMICs on the basis of their ownership of assets, housing quality and access to public services. IWI runs from 0 to 100, with 0 meaning none of the assets and lowest quality housing and services and 100 all assets and highest quality housing and services (Smits & Steendijk, 2015).

© 2022 Global Data Lab, all rights reserved. www.globaldatalab.org